Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, getting a overall score of 91.3 against 75.7. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A52 5G is an older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both of these phones have the same Android 12 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per display inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen. Galaxy A52 5G features a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.