Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, having a 91.1 score against 75.7. Even being the best we are comparing, we must note that it is also an older, a little heavier and just a bit thicker phone. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features just a little better battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.