Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's 75.7 score. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is extremely older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same display pixel density and a same size screen. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.