Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-11-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's 75.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it's way heavier and was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a way more MP back camera and a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.