Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-11-01 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active has a score of 75.8, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's 75.7 score. Despite of the fact Galaxy S7 Active is much older and way thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, it's body is still a little lighter. Galaxy S7 Active has a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster).
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel number in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has greater battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.