Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.77 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, with a overall score of 80.1 against 75.7. Although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, it must be told that it's also a incredibly older, a lot heavier and thicker device. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.