Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, having a global score of 92.3 against 75.7. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an a lot older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit lower pixels quantity in each inch of display, they both have a screen with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.