Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, getting a global score of 94.6 against 75.7. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, but it's notably heavier and was released 2 years before.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more MP and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.