Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, with an 83.1 score against 82.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has 13 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11, so it provides some nice extra features and a performance increase. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a a lot newer phone, and it's also noticeably lighter and just a little thinner than Google Pixel 4a.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same display density, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2710 pixels and a larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a much more megapixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.