Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 444 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has an overall score of 83.1, which is slightly better than HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G body is notably newer, somewhat thinner and way lighter than the HTC One M9. These phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has 13 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and better performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features just a bit better screen than HTC One M9, because it has a lot larger screen, a little better pixels count per inch in the screen and a higher 1220 x 2710 resolution. HTC One M9 has an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a greater camera than HTC One M9, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera, a much larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.