Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's 83.1 general score. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite worse pixel density, and they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a processing unit that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G one, and although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has only 256 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.