Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A31, with a overall score of 83.1 against 81.3. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a notably newer device, and it's also lighter and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A31.
Galaxy A31 features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2710px, a bit larger screen and a just a bit higher pixels amount in each screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A31, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.