Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy A41, with an 83.1 score against 81.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much better display than Galaxy A41, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2710 pixels and a little more pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A41, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB and 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A41 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A41, because it has a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photographs, a lot better 200 MP resolution back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.