Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, with an 83.8 score against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly better 1220 x 2710 resolution and a just a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy A50, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A50, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has greater battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 28 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.