Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's 83.1 overall score. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2710, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A50s features a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels, a lot larger sensor and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 28% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.