Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, with a overall score of 85.5 against 83.1. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a much heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, but both of them are 0.31inches thick.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2710, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a lot more megapixels camera, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A51, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 28% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.