Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's general score of 83.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13. Galaxy A51 5G features a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a little more pixels per inch of screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2710 pixels and a bit larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a much more MP camera, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.