Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's global score of 83.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much better display than Galaxy A52, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a bit better count of pixels in each screen inch and a little bit higher 1220 x 2710 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments, a camera with a lot better 200 MP resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has 128 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.