Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's general score of 83.1. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because it has a just a bit more pixels per display inch, a little bit higher 1220 x 2710 resolution and a little larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A52s, because it has a larger aperture for better low light photos and video, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.