Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it counts with some nice extra features and increased performance.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2710px and a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot larger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.