Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, getting a global score of 92.9 against 83.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a slightly higher 1220 x 2710 resolution and a just a bit higher screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G both count with similar cameras, although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, a back camera with a lot lower resolution and a tinier back camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.