Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's 83.1 score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and better performance.
Galaxy Fold has a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density and a slightly higher 1220 x 2710 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with lot more megapixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Fold, because although it has only 256 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.