Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 444 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, getting an 87.7 score against 83.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13. Galaxy M51 counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a better looking display than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2710 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M51, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M51, because it has a way larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a bigger aperture and a lot better resolution camera. The Galaxy M51 features a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.