Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has an overall score of 83.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 general score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's body is newer and way lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than Galaxy Note 5. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has newer 13 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch and a quite lower 1220 x 2710px resolution, it also counts with a larger display. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 7 lesser cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.