Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has an overall score of 83.1, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note5's 80.2 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G body is way newer and notably lighter, but a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note5. The Galaxy Note5 features a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of display and a little worse resolution of 1220 x 2710, it also counts with a larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and a way higher 200 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.