Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2024-01-15 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, with a 90.7 score against 83.1. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13, providing the user some additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because it has a quite better pixel quantity in each screen inch, more display brightness, a little higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a quite bigger screen. Galaxy S25 Ultra's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, and although the Galaxy S25 Ultra has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.