Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a global score of 83.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy S8 Active's global score of 81.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G design is a lot newer, noticeably lighter and thinner than Galaxy S8 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2710px, it also counts with a larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a much larger sensor, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.