Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, getting a score of 83.3 against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2710 pixels and a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.