Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 88.5 against 83.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2710 and a just a little higher pixel count in each inch in the display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5100mAh battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations, a way larger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.