Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's 83.1 overall score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a little bit greater count of pixels per screen inch and a little bit higher 1220 x 2710 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a way better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a way more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.