Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's 83.1 general score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2710 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much greater performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.