Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.19 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's overall score of 77.1. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger screen.
Google Pixel 3a has a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and a lot better 200 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.