Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's score of 77.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy A50 features a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because it has a larger aperture, a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.