Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with an 86.6 score against 77.1. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A50s has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a much higher 200 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.