Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 global score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A51, because it has a much better 200 MP resolution camera in the back, a way larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.