Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with a overall score of 90.8 against 77.1. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. Galaxy A51 5G features a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a much larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.