Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's global score of 77.1. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little worse pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
Galaxy A52 5G has a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs, a larger camera aperture and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.