Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with a 91.1 score against 77.1. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.