Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has an overall score of 77.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. These devices use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro is way thicker than Samsung Galaxy A70, it's noticeably lighter and extremely newer.
Galaxy A70 features a much faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A70. Both have the same pixels density, a same size display and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.