Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with an 85.2 score against 77.1. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a brighter display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit higher display pixels density and a bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a much more mega pixels camera, a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations and a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.