Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with a general score of 97.6 against 77.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13, counting with some additional features.
The Galaxy Fold features a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has only 256 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.