Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting an 80.2 score against 77.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit lower pixels count per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.