Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting a overall score of 98 against 77.1. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 13 OS (operating system). Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a much less MP resolution camera in the back, a tinier camera aperture and a lot smaller back camera sensor offering a way lower image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have quite similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.