Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2024-01-15 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | -- |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with a 90.7 score against 77.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13, so it gives some additional features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, more pixels per screen inch, a quite larger screen and way more brightness. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's processing unit is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a battery duration that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro one. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low light environments, and they both have a 200 MP resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.