Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Blue and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting a 77.8 score against 77.1. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version, giving lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a GPU.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number per display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.