Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's overall score of 77.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S9 feature really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S9, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.