Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting an 88.5 score against 77.1. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit lower pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, they both have a same size display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip features a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.