Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, having a 92.3 score against 77.1. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little worse pixels count in each inch in the display, they both have a screen of the same size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro. Both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a larger aperture, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.