Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 overall score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels quantity per screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.