Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2025-01-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Coral Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.86 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, having a general score of 77 against 71.6. HTC U Ultra has a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, although it has a bit smaller display. The HTC U Ultra counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a way better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G captures much better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G features a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5110mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.